Sources and their status.
Claims have different kinds of authority. An approved interpretation is not proof of metaphysics, and an active review manuscript is not a published edition.
This register explains the brief source references shown in interpreter answers. Each entry is a public synopsis, not a link to private Google Drive files or a claim that full source documents have been publicly released.
Philosophical Identity and Formal Core v1.0 / Five Movements
Actual Otherness, participatory Becoming, proportionate responsibility, freedom of conscience and disciplined interpretation. The Five Movements are Attend, Examine, Choose, Act and Integrate. “Continue” is ongoing practice.
The Theonoetica, R33 v1.1
The Pause of Presence is identified as the core teaching. The manuscript is the sole official review master as of the recorded October 10 authority index. It is not publication-cleared. A later R34 editorial candidate is unapproved.
Systematic Metaphysics 2.4 — One-Process Embodiment
Spirit is treated as one distinct subject-lineage, with embodied realisation arising in organised brain–body–world processes. A hidden, fully-formed duplicate thinker behind the brain is rejected. Empirical proof of metaphysical Spirit is not claimed.
Systematic Metaphysics 2.4 — Subjective Genidentity and Continuity Bridge
Numerical continuity, not information copying, would be required for genuine survival. The preferred TSPT theory specifies constraints on survival; it does not show that post-mortem survival or reincarnation happens.
Divine grounding, no event direction and possible illumination
FD-17–FD-19: no direct Divine selection or redirection of particular physical outcomes; possible illumination through human understanding, including without deliberate reflection. These positions are founder-approved but their formal-authority impact is still open.
Suffering and the limits of explanation
FD-23: suffering is not evidence of punishment, spiritual debt or Divine assignment. Natural, biological, environmental and social causes matter. Innocent suffering remains a serious objection to a good Divine Source.
Return as free reciprocation
FD-22: Return is freely realised alignment and relationship, not earning love or being numerically absorbed into the Divine. No automatic or guaranteed Universal Return is asserted; indefinite refusal remains possible.
Unrecognised relationship and unconditional love
FD-20–FD-21: genuine goodness need not require explicit belief. Divine love is affirmed as unconditional, without placing another's conscience under spiritual possession.
Important limitations
The AI can interpret supplied public synopses but cannot verify metaphysical truth, detect Spirit, produce revelation or certify a philosophical argument as settled. Its small retrieval corpus is not a substitute for the 37-chapter manuscript. When no relevant source exists, the interpreter should acknowledge that limit rather than invent an official position.